Trial and error has been a huge part of making and refining
the blender. In tackling the blade and
pitcher attachment, there has been a lot of trial and a lot of error. The ideal solution is still waiting to be stumbled
upon. However, even with no end result,
there is a lot to say about what has been discovered about how not to attach the blade to the
pitcher.
As mentioned in a previous post, a pitfall of the current blender
is the amount of glue used to attach the blade apparatus to the pitcher, and
finding an alternative method of attachment proves to be almost equally
problematic.
Initially, a small hole was cut in the base of the pitcher
and the blade was inserted so the lip of the bottle cap rested on the base of
the pitcher. To secure the blade, the
lip of the bottle cap was glued to the inside of the pitcher. To reduce the contact between glue and
blended matter the lip could be simply glued to the outside bottom of the
pitcher. The main problem with this
solution is that the blade assembly would have to be finished after the lip had
been glued to the pitcher because the diameter of the blade is greater than
that of the hole in the pitcher (hole in the pitcher is approximately the
diameter of the bottle lip). It is
possible to finish assembling the blade after the lip has been glued, but doing
so adds an unnecessary level of complexity.
Although this may be the most straightforward solution, is it is not
necessarily the most practical.
To find the best way to attach the blade, it was necessary
to think about completely redesigning the base of our blender. Looking at the most successful commercial
blender designs provided a framework a new design. A two-piece design composed
of a pitcher with a threaded base, and a threaded cup that holds the blade and
screws into the threaded base of the pitcher was pretty universal. Unfortunately, the dollar store pitcher
currently used for the bike blender does not have a threaded base, so to use
the current commercial design there would have to be a major modification. Regardless, a two-piece design seems
plausible and would make blade maintenance much easier.
Being able to insert and remove the blade apparatus from the
bottom requires a larger hole in the base of the pitcher, and a larger hole
means there is a larger area for liquid to seep through. An initial idea was to cut the water bottle
at a wider part and fit the diameter of the bottle into the bottom of the
pitcher, secure it and make a watertight seal.
Conceptually, this seemed like a reasonable, good solution, however, the
technicalities of how it would be constructed still had to be worked out. Another point to consider was that using more
bottle cap would mean pushing the blade higher and higher until the diameter of
the bottle matches the diameter of the seal, whereas ideally, the blade rests ¼
of an inch or less from the bottom of the pitcher.
Aware of the potential challenges of the design, it was time
to start on a prototype. Initially,
most time was spent looking into ways to secure the extended bottle cap to the
pitcher. Using a paper bowl to simulate
a rubber pitcher, a hole with a diameter of two inches was cut from the bottom
and four nails were inserted so their heads protruded into the hole. The idea behind the nails was that they would
fit into grooves cut in the water bottle, effectively holding the bottle in
place. There were a few problems
encountered during construction; first, a longer bottle makes inserting the
ball bearing nearly impossible because the channel is too narrow for a hammer,
the next drawback was that the neck of the bottle does not meet the screws at
right angles which makes it difficult for the nails to fully support the cap, and
the last problem was that connection was not watertight.
nails inserted in the paper bowl that is substituting for a plastic pitcher |
full water bottle prototype |
A few other initial prototypes:
Tin Foil seal |
rubber seal and screw lock mechanism |
To revise the blade connection design, a more effective
attachment and sealing mechanism was needed. Going back to brainstorming, a convincing idea
was to line the inner edge of the hole with rubber. A rubber lining could potentially serve both
as a sealant and a support. The logic
behind this new design was that the friction between the rubber and the bottle
may be enough to hold the blade apparatus to the pitcher, and simply placing
the rubber around the hole and jamming the cap into it may be enough to create
an adequately watertight seal. However,
thinking jamming a bottle into rubber could be the solution was slightly too
optimistic. There were many leaks in the
seal and the blade apparatus did not appear to be secure enough to be able to
withstand the force acting on it during blending.
bottle cap jammed into a rubber seal |
Thus, currently no solution has been reached about how to
connect the pitcher and blade. This
means it is back to brainstorming!
No comments:
Post a Comment